Continuing to do research to find and disclose information that KPFK radio station on air denies, hides, ignores and does-not-share with it's paying public - the stakeholders who support the station financially, even for decades. Here are some tidbits. More can be added by YOU as you discover and willing disclose what else is actual and real [ not just blurt opinions or complaints or attacks please !!].
This BLOG is intended to SHARE INFORMATION that takes many hours of research and may be confirmed [as wikipedia does with it's resources listed for the reader to validate or learn more there ].
here goes:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted:
January 9, 2014 Released: January
10, 2014
By the Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau:”
“I. The Media Bureau (“Bureau”) has before
it the application of Pacifica Foundation, Inc. (“Licensee”), for renewal of its license for Station KPFK(FM), Los
Angeles, California
(“Station”). In this Memorandum
Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”),1
we find that Licensee apparently
willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3527 of the Rules2 by failing
to retain all required documentation in
the Station’s public inspection file. Based upon our review of the record before us, we conclude that Licensee
is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) … and
"II.
BACKGROUND 2.
Section 73.3527 of the Rules requires a noncommercial broadcast licensee
to maintain a public inspection file
containing specific types of information related to station operations. The
purpose of this requirement is to
provide the public with timely information about the station at regular
intervals throughout the license period.
3.
Among the materials required for
inclusion in the file are the station’s
quarterly issues/programs lists, which must be retained until final
Commission action on the station’s next
license renewal application. ….
DA 14-31 …first quarter of 2009 are currently missing from the
public file. Licensee’s records from June 2009 indicate that the three missing lists from
2008 were timely prepared, although the missing list from 2009 was not prepared. Licensee attributes these
deficiencies to turnovers in managerial personnel.
4. Proposed Forfeiture. As Licensee
has acknowledged, at the time of the filing of the Station’s license renewal application, and
during periods within the license term, the Station’s public inspection file did not contain many of the
items required to be retained in the file by Section 73.3527 of the Rules. In this regard, where lapses occur
in maintaining the public file, neither the negligent acts nor omissions of station employees or agents, nor
the subsequent remedial actions undertaken by the licensee, excuse or nullify a licensee’s rule
violation.
The legislative history to Section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act,11 and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context.12 Section 312(f)(2) of the Act provides that “[t]he term ‘repeated,’ when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.….. "
- - - - - - - - - - -
this information may be changing or changed later, but it was found online
and the relevance of what this site says needs to be questionned to the KPFK management, staff, LSB and all others who have been dedicated to financially maintaining Our Radio Station.
(c) af 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your comments or concerns clearly, concisely and courteously here. No cursing, venting, raging or trolling [bullying, hating, mean attacks et al ] allowed. These comments can inform and the rest of us and; who care about improving KPFK.Plse Use your best word skills to communicate and be informative or questioning or making yourself helpful & understood. thank youl